Poland’s Biden? Tusk’s War on Judges, Patriots, and the Rule of Law
Gangster "liberals" in Poland, just like in D.C., will break any law to stay in power.
After losing the presidential election, Prime Minister Donald Tusk’s government is actively trying to invalidate the result and delegitimize the Supreme Court, which—according to the Constitution of the Republic of Poland—is tasked with confirming Karol Nawrocki as the new President of Poland. Last Wednesday, Minister of Justice and Attorney General Adam Bodnar officially declared that the Chamber of Extraordinary Review and Public Affairs of the Supreme Court—the body that MUST certify the presidential elections—“is not a court” and that its ruling would not be recognized by the government. Conservative circles in Poland had long warned of this scenario, as voices from the government and its sympathizers had floated this idea immediately after the election. We also knew that Tusk and his gang are willing to use every possible method—including breaking the law—to achieve their goal of “closing the system.”
Breaking the law comes easily to these “totalitarian liberals.” They've done it before, for instance by using military counterintelligence for political purposes and eliminating patriotic individuals from state institutions. We wrote about this during the scandal involving security clearances when former Eurocorps commander Gen. Jarosław Gromadziński, former Polish ambassador to NATO Tomasz Szatkowski, and esteemed historian and former director of the Military Historical Bureau Prof. Sławomir Cenckiewicz were stripped of access.
It turns out the actions of PM Tusk and the head of the Military Counterintelligence Service (SKW), Jarosław Stróżyk, were so blatantly gangster-like that the court, while reviewing Prof. Cenckiewicz’s complaint, had no choice but to rule in his favor. On his profile on x.com, Cenckiewicz revealed the verdict:
“In a ruling dated June 17, 2025, the Provincial Administrative Court in Warsaw, after reviewing a complaint filed by my legal representative, attorney Alicja Kurek, annulled the decisions of Prime Minister Donald Tusk and Jarosław Stróżyk/SKW regarding the revocation of my security clearances!
The court reviewed eight complaints concerning all the security clearances I held, which were revoked illegally!
On July 31, 2024, after two SKW officers raided my apartment to deliver the clearance revocation notice, I wrote here that I would win against this lawless banditry—that I would win against Stróżyk, Dusza, Tusk, Kujawa, and Siemoniak.
And I did! I have access to classified information again! And if they appeal today’s verdict—as they surely will—I will win in the Supreme Administrative Court too, because they blatantly broke multiple laws!”
This ruling is yet another damning confirmation of the flagrant lawlessness within the public administration under the “totalitarian liberals” of Donald Tusk’s regime—but it also carries serious implications for Poland’s intelligence services, a critical component of NATO’s eastern flank defense.
Analysis: National Security Undermined by Political Thuggery
The politically motivated revocation of security clearances has dire consequences for Poland’s national security. It undermines public trust in vital institutions like the Military Counterintelligence Service (SKW), the Internal Security Agency (ABW), and the government itself. The court’s acknowledgment that these actions were illegal only strengthens the perception of procedural abuse and gross overreach. This erodes faith in the impartiality of clearance vetting processes and may deter talented professionals from serving in positions requiring classified access. The resulting distrust complicates cooperation between citizens, businesses, and state institutions—key to national defense.
Instead of protecting the nation from espionage and foreign threats, Poland’s counterintelligence apparatus is being diverted to conduct political witch hunts. This misallocation of resources weakens Poland’s capacity to counter real threats from hostile actors like Russia, Belarus, and increasingly, Germany. Given Poland’s NATO and EU membership, this recklessness doesn't just threaten national integrity—it endangers regional stability.
Legally, the court’s verdict sets a precedent for defending individuals against unlawful state retaliation. It raises the bar for SKW and ABW, demanding legal rigor and accountability. But it may also trigger a wave of similar legal actions, taxing these institutions further.
Internationally, these scandals tarnish Poland’s reputation as a reliable NATO ally. Allies may now question Warsaw’s ability to safeguard shared intelligence or participate in joint operations. This concern has only grown after high-profile cases involving General Gromadziński and Ambassador Szatkowski drew attention across Europe.
Going forward, increased scrutiny and reform pressure are inevitable. Independent oversight, transparent criteria for initiating security reviews, and institutional safeguards are now essential to prevent politically driven abuse. If properly enacted, these reforms could restore trust and reinforce Poland’s credibility in NATO.
Polish counterintelligence must also evolve to address modern threats like cyberespionage. SKW and ABW should prioritize accreditation of IT systems, cybersecurity audits, and defense against advanced persistent threats (APT), rather than wasting resources purging political opponents.
Ultimately, the unlawful revocation of clearances, confirmed by the June 17 court ruling, poses a profound threat to Poland’s national security. It discredits institutions, drains critical resources, and intensifies societal divisions.
If SKW and ABW are to fulfill their mission, they must undergo a complete overhaul—embracing professionalism, transparency, and a firm rejection of political interference. Amid growing global threats, they must modernize and focus on real enemies, not internal vendettas.
As we mentioned at the beginning of this post, Prof. Cenckiewicz is only one of several individuals who were illegally stripped of access to classified information. Clearly, this was revenge for his research on the links between Tusk’s inner circle and the Russian security apparatus—we’ve written many times about the disgraceful (and extremely dangerous for all of NATO) 2013 cooperation agreement between SKW and the Russian FSB, signed in St. Petersburg on September 11th.
The aim was to take away his ability to work, discredit him, and send a chilling message to others who want to serve Poland: Tusk’s interest comes first. The result of this court ruling will not appear in mainstream media outlets that support Tusk because it contradicts their narrative. Instead, they will continue spreading illegal speculation about the “legitimacy of the presidential election” to undermine a process that, under Tusk’s own government, was fully supervised by the state.
All of this is an effort to reverse a result they don’t like. We will continue to update you on this dangerous process. If they succeed in repeating the precedent set in Romania, no future election in the European Union will be safe from manipulation—and that will mark the triumph of totalitarianism in Europe.
It sounds like your Tusk is very much the same kind of criminal found in the Biden/Obama regime. I suspect that we are not rid of them, yet. May God bless you and Poland.
Glad found out that I have a person of like mind, Prof Cenckiewicz, in reference of King Donald XXX
I am supporting Prof. Cenckiewicz, and his thinking about the King Donald XXX. What is very alarming is that, not dems and republicans didn’t complain about Russian interference in our elections here. There was a black mail of the Nasty Boys that if Trump will not win this election there would be a bad bloodbath here. No one pays attention to the criminality of such a blackmail of our Constitution. If that is not an act of terror then what is in accord of Americans on both sides of the swamp what terror is and what it means?
Reverting to the Epstein - Trump brotherly lives, Trump lived with Epstein as close friends for more 20 some years, going young chicks (under aged girls) wild parties together all of these years, and Trump dare to tell he never knew that Epstein was a pedophile? Like wise is with Derschovitz and the rest on the Supreme Court list that was released and Trump, Derschowitz, Wexner, Clinton, Ehud Barak ex MOSAD king, et al being on that first 100-person lists involved in An Epstein pedophile bonanza. Out of the first 100 persons 94 are men and 6 are women. We talking about raping of under age girls by males, in bigger picture. Lo and behold the mighty Dollar the Magician makes it all disappears, and not single one of these 94 males ever was investigated for a possibility of being involve in heinous crimes against minors. There are FAA required records documenting above and et al who flew to the Epstein pedo heaven, where Trump and Clinton, Derschowitz flew there many times for teenage orgies and sex with minors.
Only one woman, Giseline Maxwell was sacrificed with 20 years sentence for here role in the pedophile global ring. Maxwell knows every one of them that was at St James Pedo Heaven, and visitors in Epstein places.
I can’t understand why there is still a light service where the “supreme courts” go to judge based on the amount of money received, and not because of the Law. If court would appoint a judge to take case against Clinton, we all in United States know that this was a death sentence to that judge as the judge will commit suicide, kind like in Kreml Circus. We all know here, if you talk too much about Clinton, or the deal went bad between you and Clinton, you committed suicide soon after. There is a Clintons Dead Body Bag blogs over the internet.
Jim McDougal’s wife chose in the court proceedings to take on 3 years prison sentence for not testifying against Clintons in McDougle White Water Clinton Scandals. Her husband, already committed suicide in his cell, and next morning his dead body was cremated, without court order and no autopsy was alowed. The same system was in case of Epstein’s committing suicide in his cell. If Maxwell would agree to a plea, and testify against Clinton and Trump, just two out of 94, Maxwell too would commit suicide as McDougall and Eptsins did suicides in their jail cels. The American Judicial System is all criminal operation, a mafia. If they put you into the prison system, there is only one reason, you will commit suicide in your jail cell. And this is the world of Clintons, Trump, and the like...Will Rock eliminate my post in order to keep padling Trumps shit for some profit? We will see Rock’s Character